D.M.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

D.M.C. v. State

888 So. 2d 757, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19098, 2004 WL 2892205

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in D.M.C. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 17374 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 15, 2004·No. No. 2D03-1900·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

D.M.C. appeals an order adjudicating him delinquent for aggravated battery with a deadly weapon. We affirm the adjudication of delinquency. We affirm the disposition order but remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error and an omission in the order. The order mistakenly designates a public defender’s fee of $800 when the court orally pronounced, and D.M.C. agreed to pay, a $300 fee. In addition, the order fails to state the maximum term of commitment. On remand, the trial court should correct the order in these two respects.

Affirmed and remanded.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and DAVIS and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

D.M.C. appeals an order adjudicating him delinquent for aggravated battery with a deadly weapon. We affirm the adjudication of delinquency. We affirm the disposition order but remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error and an omission in the order. The order mistakenly designates a public defender’s fee of $800 when the court orally pronounced, and D.M.C. agreed to pay, a $300 fee. In addition, the order fails to state the maximum term of commitment. On remand, the trial court should correct the order in these two respects.

Affirmed and remanded.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and DAVIS and WALLACE, JJ., Concur.

D.M.C. v. State, 888 So. 2d 757, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 19098, 2004 WL 2892205 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

888 So. 2d 757 (D.M.C. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.