D.M.C. v. Juvenile Officer

Missouri Court of Appeals

D.M.C. v. Juvenile Officer

388 S.W.3d 221, 2012 WL 4774661

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 9, 2012·No. No. WD 74665·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

D.M.C. (“Mother”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding it had jurisdiction under RSMo 211.031.1 and removing from Mother’s custody her five minor children. In her one point on appeal, Mother argues that the juvenile officer did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that Mother exhibited a pattern of neglect towards her children nor did the officer prove that Mother failed to protect her children from sexual abuse. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

D.M.C. (“Mother”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding it had jurisdiction under RSMo 211.031.1 and removing from Mother’s custody her five minor children. In her one point on appeal, Mother argues that the juvenile officer did not prove by clear and convincing evidence that Mother exhibited a pattern of neglect towards her children nor did the officer prove that Mother failed to protect her children from sexual abuse. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

D.M.C. v. Juvenile Officer, 388 S.W.3d 221, 2012 WL 4774661 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

388 S.W.3d 221 (D.M.C. v. Juvenile Officer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.