D.L.J. v. Juvenile Officer

Missouri Court of Appeals

D.L.J. v. Juvenile Officer

470 S.W.3d 390, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 898, 2015 WL 5227840

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 8, 2015·No. WD 77996·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

D.L.J. appeals from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Family Court and Juvenile Division, sustaining an allegation that he would be found criminally responsible if tried as an adult for tampering in the second degree, § 569.090. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served' by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been'provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

D.L.J. appeals from a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Family Court and Juvenile Division, sustaining an allegation that he would be found criminally responsible if tried as an adult for tampering in the second degree, § 569.090. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served' by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been'provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

D.L.J. v. Juvenile Officer, 470 S.W.3d 390, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 898, 2015 WL 5227840 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

470 S.W.3d 390 (D.L.J. v. Juvenile Officer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.