D.L.J. v. B.R.J.

887 So. 2d 251, 2004 Ala. LEXIS 55, 2004 WL 473801
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedMarch 12, 2004
Docket1022192
StatusPublished

This text of 887 So. 2d 251 (D.L.J. v. B.R.J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
D.L.J. v. B.R.J., 887 So. 2d 251, 2004 Ala. LEXIS 55, 2004 WL 473801 (Ala. 2004).

Opinion

WOODALL, Justice.

The petition for the writ of certiorari is quashed.

In quashing the petition for the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Civil Appeals’ opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973). See also Smith v. Equifax Servs., Inc., 537 So.2d 463, 465 (Ala.1988).

WRIT QUASHED.

HOUSTON, LYONS, BROWN, and JOHNSTONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.
537 So. 2d 463 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1988)
Horsley v. Horsley
280 So. 2d 155 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
887 So. 2d 251, 2004 Ala. LEXIS 55, 2004 WL 473801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dlj-v-brj-ala-2004.