D.L.F. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

D.L.F. v. State

793 So. 2d 1188, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13195, 2001 WL 1093269

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 19, 2001

DocketNo. 3D01-23

StatusPublished

This text of 793 So. 2d 1188 (D.L.F. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

D.L.F. v. State, 793 So. 2d 1188, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13195, 2001 WL 1093269 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the evidentiary ruling challenged on appeal. “It is axiomatic that failure to proffer what the excluded evidence would have revealed precludes appellate consideration of the alleged error.” A. McD. v. State, 422 So.2d 336, 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Mosley v. State, 616 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). However, on remand, the trial court shall conform the written community control order to reflect the oral pronouncement withholding adjudication.

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the evidentiary ruling challenged on appeal. “It is axiomatic that failure to proffer what the excluded evidence would have revealed precludes appellate consideration of the alleged error.” A. McD. v. State, 422 So.2d 336, 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Mosley v. State, 616 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). However, on remand, the trial court shall conform the written community control order to reflect the oral pronouncement withholding adjudication.

Affirmed; remanded with instructions.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

793 So. 2d 1188, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13195, 2001 WL 1093269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dlf-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack