D.L.F. v. State
793 So. 2d 1188, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13195, 2001 WL 1093269
Opinion
We affirm the evidentiary ruling challenged on appeal. “It is axiomatic that failure to proffer what the excluded evidence would have revealed precludes appellate consideration of the alleged error.” A. McD. v. State, 422 So.2d 336, 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Mosley v. State, 616 So.2d 1129 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993). However, on remand, the trial court shall conform the written community control order to reflect the oral pronouncement withholding adjudication.
Affirmed; remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
D.L.F. v. State, 793 So. 2d 1188, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13195, 2001 WL 1093269 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
793 So. 2d 1188 (D.L.F. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mosley v. State
616 So. 2d 1129 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
A. McD. v. State
422 So. 2d 336 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)