Dlabal v. Abrell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Dlabal v. Abrell

848 So. 2d 430, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9905, 2003 WL 21501936

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 2, 2003·No. No. 1D03-1663·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellants’ response to the Court’s order of May 5, 2003, we dismiss this appeal as premature. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97, 99 (Fla.1974); City of Tallahassee v. Big Bend PBA, 703 So.2d 1066, 1069 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The appellants sought review of an order on a complaint for a pure bill of discovery. However, as this order requires production of medical records for the purpose of conducting an in camera inspection, additional judicial labor remains to be done and the order is not final. Cf. Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc. v. Hegwood, 569 So.2d 1295 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

KAHN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the appellants’ response to the Court’s order of May 5, 2003, we dismiss this appeal as premature. See S.L.T. Warehouse Co. v. Webb, 304 So.2d 97, 99 (Fla.1974); City of Tallahassee v. Big Bend PBA, 703 So.2d 1066, 1069 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). The appellants sought review of an order on a complaint for a pure bill of discovery. However, as this order requires production of medical records for the purpose of conducting an in camera inspection, additional judicial labor remains to be done and the order is not final. Cf. Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc. v. Hegwood, 569 So.2d 1295 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).

KAHN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., concur.

Dlabal v. Abrell, 848 So. 2d 430, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 9905, 2003 WL 21501936 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

848 So. 2d 430 (Dlabal v. Abrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related