D'la Rosa v. Rodriguez
This text of 460 So. 2d 567 (D'la Rosa v. Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon consideration of the record and briefs of counsel we are convinced that the trial court did not err in entering judgment pursuant to a jury verdict which appellants contend included inconsistent findings. We find no merit in this contention. The record demonstrates that the answers provided by the jury on the special interrogatory verdict are all that are necessary to properly determine liability and damages as between the parties. No reversible error having been demonstrated, the judgment appealed is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
460 So. 2d 567, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 37, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dla-rosa-v-rodriguez-fla-1984.