DKFT Pizza, Inc. v. Riviera Plaza, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

DKFT Pizza, Inc. v. Riviera Plaza, LLC

71 A.D.3d 816, 895 N.Y.S.2d 877

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 2010

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 71 A.D.3d 816 (DKFT Pizza, Inc. v. Riviera Plaza, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DKFT Pizza, Inc. v. Riviera Plaza, LLC, 71 A.D.3d 816, 895 N.Y.S.2d 877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract and for a permanent injunction compelling the defendants Riviera Plaza, LLC, and Riviera Plaza Associates to terminate their lease with the defendants DCB Food Services Corp., doing business as Sandella’s Café, and Danielle DiBenedetto, the defendants Riviera Plaza, LLC, and Riviera Plaza Associates appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Fusco, J.), dated December 12, 2008, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction to the extent of enjoining the defendants DCB Food Services Corp., doing business as Sandella’s Café, and Danielle DiBenedetto from selling certain food and beverage items at their restaurant within the shopping center owned by the defendants Riviera Plaza, LLC, and Riviera Plaza Associates.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Only “[a]n aggrieved party or a person substituted for him may appeal from any appealable . . . order” (CPLR 5511). “A party is aggrieved by an order when it directly affects that party’s individual rights” (Berrechid v Shahin, 60 AD3d 884 [2009]; see Carollo v Northern Westchester Hosp. Ctr., 5 AD3d [817]*817715 [2004]). Since the Supreme Court’s order, which preliminarily enjoined the defendants DCB Food Services Corp., doing business as Sandella’s Cafe, and Danielle DiBenedetto from selling certain food and beverage items at their café, did not affect the rights of the defendants Riviera Plaza, LLC, and Riviera Plaza Associates, the latter two are not aggrieved by the order, and the appeal must be dismissed (see generally Matter of Commercial Bank of Informatics & Computing Technique Dev. Bank Informtechnika v Ostashko, 274 AD2d 516 [2000]; Law v Benedict, 197 AD2d 808 [1993]; see also Won’s Cards v Samsondale/Haverstraw Equities, 165 AD2d 157, 162 [1991]). Florio, J.P., Angiolillo, Balkin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract and for a permanent injunction compelling the defendants Riviera Plaza, LLC, and Riviera Plaza Associates to terminate their lease with the defendants DCB Food Services Corp., doing business as Sandella’s Café, and Danielle DiBenedetto, the defendants Riviera Plaza, LLC, and Riviera Plaza Associates appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Fusco, J.), dated December 12, 2008, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction to the extent of enjoining the defendants DCB Food Services Corp., doing business as Sandella’s Café, and Danielle DiBenedetto from selling certain food and beverage items at their restaurant within the shopping center owned by the defendants Riviera Plaza, LLC, and Riviera Plaza Associates.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Only “[a]n aggrieved party or a person substituted for him may appeal from any appealable . . . order” (CPLR 5511). “A party is aggrieved by an order when it directly affects that party’s individual rights” (Berrechid v Shahin, 60 AD3d 884 [2009]; see Carollo v Northern Westchester Hosp. Ctr., 5 AD3d [817]*817715 [2004]). Since the Supreme Court’s order, which preliminarily enjoined the defendants DCB Food Services Corp., doing business as Sandella’s Cafe, and Danielle DiBenedetto from selling certain food and beverage items at their café, did not affect the rights of the defendants Riviera Plaza, LLC, and Riviera Plaza Associates, the latter two are not aggrieved by the order, and the appeal must be dismissed (see generally Matter of Commercial Bank of Informatics & Computing Technique Dev. Bank Informtechnika v Ostashko, 274 AD2d 516 [2000]; Law v Benedict, 197 AD2d 808 [1993]; see also Won’s Cards v Samsondale/Haverstraw Equities, 165 AD2d 157, 162 [1991]). Florio, J.P., Angiolillo, Balkin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

71 A.D.3d 816, 895 N.Y.S.2d 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dkft-pizza-inc-v-riviera-plaza-llc-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack