D.K.A. v. State
120 So. 3d 624, 2013 WL 4614682, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13977
Opinion
D.K.A. challenges the juvenile court’s finding that he committed battery on an elderly person and abuse of a disabled person. We find no error in that decision and affirm without further comment. But we reverse the court’s order of probation because it does not state the term of the probation imposed. We remand with directions to enter a corrected probationary order. See J.M.W. v. State, 935 So.2d 630, 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
D.K.A. v. State, 120 So. 3d 624, 2013 WL 4614682, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 13977 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
120 So. 3d 624 (D.K.A. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J.M.W. v. State
935 So. 2d 630 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)