Djurdjevich v. Flat Rate Movers, Ltd.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 30, 2020·No. 1:17-cv-00261·Unknown

Opinion

DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ne SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Mirko Djurdjevich, et al., Plaintiffs, 17-cv-261 (AJN) ~ ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND Flat Rate Movers, Ltd., ef al., RECOMMENDATION Defendants.

ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge: Before the Court is Judge Barbara Moses’s August 5, 2020 Report & Recommendation recommending that the Court dismiss without prejudice the claims of plaintiff Najdan Nikolic due to his failure to participate in discovery, even after the Court ordered him to respond to written discovery by June 10, 2020 and to appear for deposition by July 10, 2020. Dkt. No. 112 (“R&R”). When considering the findings and recommendations of a Magistrate Judge, the Court may “accept, reject, or modify [them], in whole or in part.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court must make a de novo determination of any portions of a magistrate’s report or findings to which a party raises an objection, and reviews only for “clear error on the face of the record” when there are no timely objections to the R & R. Banks v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 19-cv-929 (AJN) (SDA), 2020 WL 2765686, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 27, 2020); see also Brennan vy. Colvin, No. 13- cv-6338 (AJN), 2015 WL 1402204, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 25, 2015); Hicks v. Ercole, No. 09-cv- 2531 (AJN) (MHD), 2015 WL 1266800, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 18, 2015); Gomez v. Brown, 655 Supp. 2d 332, 341 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). Clear error is found only when, upon review of the entire record, the Court is left with “the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been

committed.” Laster v. Mancini, No. 07-CV-8265 (DAB) (MHD), 2013 WL 5405468, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 25, 2013) (quoting United States v. Snow, 462 F.3d 55, 72 (2d Cir. 2006)). As of this date, no objections to the R & R have been filed, and the deadline for objections has passed. See R & R at 5. Thus, the Court reviews the R & R for clear error, and it finds none. The Court therefore adopts the R & R in its entirety and GRANTS Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff Nikolic’s claims without prejudice for the reasons provided in Judge Moses’s R & R. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 30, 2020 A \) Asti New York, New York □ ye ALISONJ.NATHAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Djurdjevich v. Flat Rate Movers, Ltd., (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Djurdjevich v. Flat Rate Movers, Ltd. (Djurdjevich v. Flat Rate Movers, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Fred Snow, Marcus Snow, Rahad Ross
462 F.3d 55 (Second Circuit, 2006)