Djonovic v. Zunic

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Djonovic v. Zunic

270 A.D.2d 224, 704 N.Y.S.2d 839, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2526

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 6, 2000·Published

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for defamation, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated October 8, [225]*2251998, which granted the motion of the defendant John Zunic to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The statements in question were covered by an absolute privilege (see, Romeo v Village of Fishkill, 248 AD2d 700; Herzfeld & Stern v Beck, 175 AD2d 689, 691; Grasso v Mathew, 164 AD2d 476; Missick v Big V Supermarkets, 115 AD2d 808). Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Thompson and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for defamation, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated October 8, [225]*2251998, which granted the motion of the defendant John Zunic to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The statements in question were covered by an absolute privilege (see, Romeo v Village of Fishkill, 248 AD2d 700; Herzfeld & Stern v Beck, 175 AD2d 689, 691; Grasso v Mathew, 164 AD2d 476; Missick v Big V Supermarkets, 115 AD2d 808). Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Thompson and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Djonovic v. Zunic, 270 A.D.2d 224, 704 N.Y.S.2d 839, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

270 A.D.2d 224 (Djonovic v. Zunic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related