Djonovic v. Zunic

270 A.D.2d 224, 704 N.Y.S.2d 839, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2526

This text of 270 A.D.2d 224 (Djonovic v. Zunic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Djonovic v. Zunic, 270 A.D.2d 224, 704 N.Y.S.2d 839, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for defamation, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Milano, J.), dated October 8, [225]*2251998, which granted the motion of the defendant John Zunic to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The statements in question were covered by an absolute privilege (see, Romeo v Village of Fishkill, 248 AD2d 700; Herzfeld & Stern v Beck, 175 AD2d 689, 691; Grasso v Mathew, 164 AD2d 476; Missick v Big V Supermarkets, 115 AD2d 808). Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Thompson and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Missick v. Big V Supermarkets, Inc.
115 A.D.2d 808 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Grasso v. Mathew
164 A.D.2d 476 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Herzfeld & Stern, Inc. v. Beck
175 A.D.2d 689 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Romeo v. Village of Fishkill
248 A.D.2d 700 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
270 A.D.2d 224, 704 N.Y.S.2d 839, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/djonovic-v-zunic-nyappdiv-2000.