Djokou v. Holder

328 F. App'x 866
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 27, 2009·No. 08-1870·Unpublished

Opinion

Petition dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

*867 PER CURIAM:

Emmanuel Djokou, a native and citizen of Cameroon, seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s decision denying his application for a waiver under 8 U.S.C. § 1186a(c)(4) (2006), and finding him ineligible for voluntary departure. We have reviewed the administrative record and conclude that we are without jurisdiction to review those determinations. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)®, (ii) (2006); Suvorov v. Gonzales, 441 F.3d 618, 621-22 (8th Cir.2006); Nga rurih v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 182, 193 (4th Cir.2004). Though Djokou raises a claim that he was denied due process in the hearing regarding the waiver, we note that such a claim is not cognizable given that “[n]o property or liberty interest can exist when the relief sought is discretionary.” Dekoladenu v. Gonzales, 459 F.3d 500, 508 (4th Cir.2006), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 128 S.Ct. 2986, 171 L.Ed.2d 884 (2008).

We accordingly dismiss the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before'the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Djokou v. Holder, 328 F. App'x 866 (4th Cir. 2009).

328 F. App'x 866 (Djokou v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related