Djimas v. Alger
This text of 239 A.D. 873 (Djimas v. Alger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Orders reversed on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements in one appeal, and motions granted, with ten dollars costs in one motion. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Bliss, J., dissents and votes to affirm on the ground that these are discretionary orders and that there was no abuse of discretion by the Special Term.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 A.D. 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/djimas-v-alger-nyappdiv-1933.