Djibril Jackson v. Mohammed Khan
This text of Djibril Jackson v. Mohammed Khan (Djibril Jackson v. Mohammed Khan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-21-00322-CV ___________________________
DJIBRIL JACKSON, Appellant
V.
MOHAMMED KHAN, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 Denton County, Texas Trial Court No. CV-2021-03143-JP
Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
Appellant’s brief was due on January 13, 2022, but no brief was filed. See Tex.
R. App. P. 38.6(a).
On January 31, 2022, we notified Appellant that his brief had not been filed as
the Rules of Appellate Procedure require. See id. We warned that we could dismiss the
appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, Appellant filed a brief along with
an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the brief’s untimeliness. See Tex. R.
App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). More than ten days have passed, but we have not
received a response.
Because Appellant has failed to file a brief, we dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: March 3, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Djibril Jackson v. Mohammed Khan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/djibril-jackson-v-mohammed-khan-texapp-2022.