Djeddah v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Djeddah v. Williams

134 A.D.3d 479, 19 N.Y.S.3d 890

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 2015

Docket16356 111319/95

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 134 A.D.3d 479 (Djeddah v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Djeddah v. Williams, 134 A.D.3d 479, 19 N.Y.S.3d 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about December 11, 2014, which granted plaintiff Rachel Djeddah’s oral application for an extension of time to comply with the terms of a conditional order of dismissal, same court and Justice, dated August 8, 2014, to the extent of directing plaintiff to serve expert disclosure within 30 days and to withdraw her motion to vacate the conditional order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

*480 The order, issued at a conference, is not appealable as of right because it did not decide a motion made on notice (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; Sholes v Meagher, 100 NY2d 333 [2003]; Sidelev v Tsal-Tsalko, 52 AD3d 398 [1st Dept 2008]). Concur— Tom, J.P., Friedman, Saxe and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered on or about December 11, 2014, which granted plaintiff Rachel Djeddah’s oral application for an extension of time to comply with the terms of a conditional order of dismissal, same court and Justice, dated August 8, 2014, to the extent of directing plaintiff to serve expert disclosure within 30 days and to withdraw her motion to vacate the conditional order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

*480 The order, issued at a conference, is not appealable as of right because it did not decide a motion made on notice (see CPLR 5701 [a] [2]; Sholes v Meagher, 100 NY2d 333 [2003]; Sidelev v Tsal-Tsalko, 52 AD3d 398 [1st Dept 2008]). Concur— Tom, J.P., Friedman, Saxe and Gische, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 A.D.3d 479, 19 N.Y.S.3d 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/djeddah-v-williams-nyappdiv-2015.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack