Djan v. Wal-Mart Associates

CourtNorth Carolina Industrial Commission
DecidedJuly 29, 2011
DocketI.C. NO. 088770.
StatusPublished

This text of Djan v. Wal-Mart Associates (Djan v. Wal-Mart Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Carolina Industrial Commission primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Djan v. Wal-Mart Associates, (N.C. Super. Ct. 2011).

Opinion

***********
The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Homick and the briefs and arguments of the parties. The appealing party has not shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence, receive further evidence, or rehear the parties. The Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Homick and enters the following Opinion and Award.

***********
The Full Commission finds as a fact and concludes as a matter of law the following, which were entered into by the parties as:

STIPULATIONS
1. The parties are subject to the N.C. Workers' Compensation Act. *Page 2

2. An employee-employer relationship existed between the named employee and named employer.

3. The carrier liable on the risk is correctly named above.

4. On September 4, 2008, the employee's average weekly was $488.40, resulting in a weekly compensation rate of $325.62.

5. The parties stipulated to the admissibility of the following documents, which were received into evidence by Deputy Commissioner Homick:

a. Exhibit 1: Pre-Trial Agreement;

b. Exhibit 2: Plaintiff's Medical Records; and

c. Exhibit 3: Industrial Commission Forms, Discovery Responses and Receipts for Payment of Medical Bills Incurred in Ghana, West Africa, (pages 1-115).

6. In addition, Plaintiff introduced the following exhibit, which was received into evidence by Deputy Commissioner Homick:

a. Plaintiff's Exhibit 1: Plaintiff's Medical Records from Ghana, West Africa

***********
As set forth in the Pre-Trial Agreement and Deputy Commissioner Homick's October 27, 2010 Opinion and Award, the Full Commission addresses the following:

ISSUES
1. Was Plaintiff injured by accident while in the scope of his employment on or about September 4, 2008, as defined by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-2(6)?

2. If so, to what, if any, benefits is Plaintiff entitled?

*********** *Page 3
Based upon all of the competent evidence of record and reasonable inferences flowing therefrom, the Full Commission makes the following:

FINDINGS OF FACT
1. At the time of the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner, Plaintiff was twenty-six (26) years old and resided in Accra, Ghana. Plaintiff graduated from high school and was enrolled in a university in Ghana, where he studied political science. Plaintiff anticipated that he would receive his degree in May 2011.

2. In the summer of 2008, Plaintiff came to the United States through American Work Adventure, an internship program. Through this program, Plaintiff was assigned to work at Defendant-Employer.

3. During the year prior to coming to the United States, Plaintiff was a full-time student and also worked approximately five hours per week as a graphic designer. Plaintiff earned approximately $102.00 per month at that time. Plaintiff also taught Basic English and Mathematics to students in the first through fifth grades and was paid for this work.

4. On July 8, 2008, Plaintiff commenced work for Defendant-Employer in Kitty Hawk, North Carolina, where he was employed as an overnight stocker. This was a temporary work assignment. Plaintiff's job duties required him to stock merchandise by placing it on racks and shelves and deposit trash into the recycling bin in the back room of the store. Plaintiff worked the night shift from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.

5. Plaintiff testified that during his shift, at approximately 5:00 a.m. on September 4, 2008, he was assigned to collect trash and place it in the recycling bin in the back room of the store. Plaintiff stated that while in the back room, his co-worker, "Norman," was gathering shopping carts. Plaintiff claims Norman was pushing four shopping carts that were stacked *Page 4 together. Plaintiff testified he was throwing trash into the recycling bin in the back room when Norman pushed the four shopping carts towards him. Plaintiff stated one of the shopping carts flipped and struck him on the outside of his left knee while he was throwing the trash into the recycling bin.

6. Plaintiff testified that he fell down after the shopping cart struck him on the left knee. That same day, Plaintiff informed his supervisor that a shopping cart had struck him and he was given ice and a bandage to place on his knee. Following this incident, Plaintiff went to the lunchroom and remained there until 7:00 a.m., when he was taken home. Plaintiff testified that following the September 4, 2008 accident, he did not experience any bleeding or bruising, but that he later experienced slight swelling in his left knee.

7. Kenneth Johnson, who was also a night stocker with Defendant-Employer, was working with Plaintiff on September 4, 2008. Mr. Johnson testified that he was in the back room of the store stacking pallets when Norman and Plaintiff shouted to get his attention. Plaintiff pretended he was dribbling a bag of plastic as if it were a ball. Plaintiff then ran and jumped as if he were shooting a basket and threw the plastic into the recycling bin. According to Mr. Johnson, while Plaintiff was in the air, Norman pushed a shopping cart in front of Plaintiff, which struck his left leg. Mr. Johnson testified that the shopping cart was moving at a gentle roll when Plaintiff struck his left knee against the cart.

8. According to Mr. Johnson, when Plaintiff struck his leg against the shopping cart, there was no loud noise and he did not recall Plaintiff falling down. Mr. Johnson did not learn that Plaintiff was claiming that he was injured until several days later when Plaintiff told him that he was not going to work because his leg was hurting. *Page 5

9. On September 10, 2008, Plaintiff presented to Dr. James Owens, a family physician. Dr. Owens' examination of Plaintiff's left knee revealed pain with flexion and slight tenderness to palpation of his left kneecap. Plaintiff did not have any bruising or swelling at this visit. Dr. Owens testified there was no evidence of any kind of internal derangement in Plaintiff's left knee. Dr. Owens diagnosed Plaintiff with non-specific knee pain, referred Plaintiff for an x-ray of his left knee and prescribed anti-inflammatory medication. Dr. Owens released Plaintiff from work for three days. The x-ray of Plaintiff's left knee was negative.

10. Plaintiff returned to Dr. Owens on September 12, 2008. There were no significant changes in Dr. Owens' examination of Plaintiff and he continued to diagnose Plaintiff with non-specific left knee pain. Dr. Owens prescribed a different anti-inflammatory and muscle relaxant and released Plaintiff from work through September 21, 2008.

11. On September 16, 2008, Plaintiff presented to Dr. Brian Baxter at the emergency department of The Outer Banks Hospital. Plaintiff reported that while working for Defendant-Employer, he jumped up in the air to throw things into a bin and when he came down, he struck a shopping cart with his left knee. Dr.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chambers v. . Oil Company
153 S.E. 594 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Djan v. Wal-Mart Associates, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/djan-v-wal-mart-associates-ncworkcompcom-2011.