Djaleh Sadaghiani Soheyl Amirinoor Sahar Amirinoor v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

951 F.2d 1260, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 32544, 1991 WL 274103
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedDecember 19, 1991
Docket91-9515
StatusPublished

This text of 951 F.2d 1260 (Djaleh Sadaghiani Soheyl Amirinoor Sahar Amirinoor v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Djaleh Sadaghiani Soheyl Amirinoor Sahar Amirinoor v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 951 F.2d 1260, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 32544, 1991 WL 274103 (10th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

951 F.2d 1260

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

Djaleh SADAGHIANI; Soheyl Amirinoor; Sahar Amirinoor, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 91-9515.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Dec. 19, 1991.

Before McKAY, Chief Judge, and SEYMOUR and EBEL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

McKAY, Chief Judge.

The parties have agreed that this case may be submitted for decision on the briefs. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(f); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.2. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This appeal arises from the immigration judge's denial of Petitioners' application for asylum and withholding of deportation to Iran. Petitioners claim the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") erred in dismissing their appeal from the immigration judge's decision.

After a thorough examination of the briefs and the record, we affirm the BIA's disposition for substantially the reasons stated therein.

AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
951 F.2d 1260, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 32544, 1991 WL 274103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/djaleh-sadaghiani-soheyl-amirinoor-sahar-amirinoor-ca10-1991.