D.J. v. J.D.

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 14-JUL-2026 10:03 AM Dkt. 16 ORD

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________

D.J., Petitioner,

vs.

J.D., Respondent. ________________________________________________________________

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1DV121006689)

ORDER (By: Devens, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., and Circuit Judge Malinao, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Before this court is Petitioner’s petition for writ of

mandamus, filed May 15, 2026, and Petitioner’s amended petition

for writ of mandamus, filed May 20, 2026. These petitions

sought an order directing the court reporter to file the

previously-requested transcripts in Petitioner’s underlying

appeal. The last of the requested transcripts were filed on May

22, 2026. See CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX Dkt. 122.

It is hereby ordered:

1. The petitions for writ of mandamus are denied as moot. 2. The motion filed on June 16, 2026, requesting to

supplement the record, is denied as moot.

3. The appellate clerk shall process the petitions

without payment of the filing fee, and the filing fees collected

in this proceeding shall be refunded.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, July 14, 2026.

/s/ Vladimir P. Devens

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Clarissa Y. Malinao