DJ v. CJ

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in DJ v. CJ. Read the opinion of the Court — 464 P.3d 790
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided April 19, 2018·No. SCWC-17-0000027·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-17-0000027 19-APR-2018 10:26 AM

SCWC-17-0000027

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

DJ,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

CJ,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-17-0000027; FC-D NO. 12-1-6689)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee’s application for writ of certiorari filed on February 23, 2018, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, April 19, 2018. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DJ v. CJ, (haw 2018).

DJ v. CJ (DJ v. CJ) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.