Dizon v. Dizon

Opinion

SUT :JQCiURT

7 rr o cofip1 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM

KRISTIAN CHITONGCO DIZON, Superior Court Case No. DM0370-21

Plaintiff DECISION AND ORDER RE SPOUSAL VS. SUPPORT KRISTAL ANN O’CONNOR DIZON,

Defendant.

The Court here considers whether to award pendente lite spousal support to Defendant

Kristal Dizon. Having reviewed the evidence presented in the recent hearing related to child

custody, as well as the parties’ submissions and the relevant law, the Court GRANTS the Motion.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Court incorporates the findings from its Decision and Order concerning child

custody, issued concurrently with this Decision and Order. References to exhibits pertain to

exhibits admitted in the course of the hearing on child custody.

On September 1, 2021, Kristal moved for an award of spousal support pendente lite. She

asks that she be awarded half of Plaintiff Kristian Dizon’s monthly income. DM380-21 (Deci.

Kristal Dizon, ¶ 33 (Sep. 1, 2021).

Kristian was on active duty orders with the Guam National Guard until September 30,

2021. His monthly pay while on active duty orders was approximately $8,869. Exs. A, B. On

October 1, 2021, he returned to his employment with Bank of Guam and now earns $4,804.98

per month, plus $719.80 per month from the Guard National Guard for his weekend warrior

duties. In total, his current gross monthly income equates to roughly $5,525. His monthly

H DM03 70-21 . DECISION AND ORDER RE SPOUSAL SUPP q T Page 2

expenses include an apartment, an auto loan and auto insurance for the parties’ two cars, credit

card bills for expenses incurred by Kristal during the marriage, and medical and dental insurance

for the family.1

Since late August 2021, Kristal has resided in Oklahoma. It is unknown whether she will

remain in Oklahoma following the Court’s decision mandating that ED. be returned to Guam.

Prior to leaving Guam, Kristal did not work--she had E.D. in her custody throughout the

week which prevented her from obtaining regular employment.2 If Kristal returns to Guam, E.D.

will be enrolled in school and the parties will split physical custody of E.D. throughout the week.

This schedule will not preclude Kristal, who is thirty-two years old, from obtaining full-time

employment, though Guam’s job market opportunities nor market wage have been established.

Notably, Kristal has not held a steady job and has a high school degree, however she has had

training in medical coding and also has developed a Reiki practice.

If Kristal remains in Oklahoma, she can work full-time as she has family support there.

Kristal interviewed for jobs in Oklahoma offering $15 per hour, which translates to an annual

income of $3 1,200 or a monthly income of $2,600. She also pays for a portion of an apartment,

as well as credit card bills.

Submitted child support worksheets place the potential child support obligation at

between $800 and $1200 per month.

II. LAW AND DISCUSSION

“When an action for dissolution of marriage is pending, the court may, in its discretion,

require the husband or wife, as the case may be, to pay as alimony any money necessary to

enable the wife, or husband, to support herself and her children, or to support himself and his

‘During the custody hearing, there was testimony of the contents of the parties’ bank accounts. It is unclear what amounts remain in those accounts. 2 Kristal received Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (“PUA”) benefits until August 2021. Since those benefits ceased by the time of Kristal’s motion, the Court does not consider the PUA payments relevant to its analysis.

r DM0370-21 CI$ION MD ORDER RE SPOUSAL SUPPT Page 3

children, or prosecute or defend the action.” 19 GCA § 8402. The purpose of temporary spousal

support is to enable the economically dependent spouse to live in his or her accustomed manner

while the divorce action is pending. Malabanan v. Malabanan, 2013 Guam 30 ¶ 2$ (citing

Whelan v. Whelan, 197 P.2d 361, 362-63 (Cal. Ct. App. 1948)). In determining an amount of

spousal support, the trial court must exercise its sound discretion, considering the circumstances

of the parties, their necessities, and ability to pay. See Cruz v. Cruz, 2005 Guam 3 ¶ 10 (citing

Arnold v. Arnold, 12 P.2d 435, 436 (Cal. 1932)). This requires examining the parties’ respective

incomes and earning abilities, the property each possesses, and their needs. See Cruz, 2005

Guam 3 ¶ 10 (citing Sweeley v. Sweeley, 170 P.2d 469, 470 (Cal. 1946)). Additionally, courts

have looked to the parties’ prior and present standard of living, the length of the marriage, and

the parties’ age, education, and respective abilities. Kang v. Kang, 2014 Guam 10 ¶ 10.

The Court first looks at their respective incomes. Since October 1, 2021, Kristian makes

roughly $5,525 in combined income from Bank of Guam and the Guam National Guard.

Kristian also pays for an auto loan, auto insurance, and the parties’ health insurance, though no

specific amounts were provided for these expenses. Kristian also appears potentially subject to

pay between $800 and $1200 per month in child support. As for Kristal, there is no evidence

that she found a job in Oklahoma, though she testified that she interviewed for jobs that offered

$15 per hour. If she acquires a position at that salary level, she will earn a monthly income of

$2,600.

Given Kristian’s monthly income, Kristal’s historical dependence on Kristian for

financial support during the seven years of marriage, Kristal’s youth and ability to obtain a job,

and Kristian’s obligations to pay for the parties’ auto and health expenses, the Court finds a

monthly spousal support award of $1,000 to be appropriate to support Kristal during the

pendency of the case and while she transitions to financial independence. DM0370-21 .DECISION AND ORDER RE SPOUSAL SUPP T Page 4

The Court further awards spousal support of $1,000 retroactive to the date of Kristal’s

Motion. Therefore Kristian owes retroactive spousal support in the total amount of $3,000 for

the months of October, November and December. However, specifically for the one month of

September 2021, in which Kristian was still on active duty orders and earned a much higher

income, the Court awards spousal support of one-third of his income of $8,868, which is $2,956.

III. CONCLUSION AND ORDER

The Court GRANTS Kristal’s Motion for spousal support pendente lite and ORDERS

Kristian to pay Kristal $1,000 per month. Moreover, the Court ORDERS arrears in the amount

of $5,956.

$0 ORDERED this 15th day of December 2021.

HON. EXZE M. IRIARTE Judge, Superior Court of Guam

SERVICE VIA E-MAIL adwed that 10 copy of the odo]a) was e.matedto: c1.7 4i1 j1me:_1 i7) Joseph 8arn Jr. CidcSu C4t

Appearing Attorneys: Catherine Bejerana Camacho, Esq., Law Office of Catherine Bejerana Camacho, for Plaintiff Kristian Chitongco Dizon Curtis Van de veld, Esq., The Van de veld Law Offices, P.C., for Defendant Kristal Ann O’Connor Dizon

f r