Dizer v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Dizer v. State

716 S.W.2d 1, 290 Ark. 68, 1986 Ark. LEXIS 2200

DecidedSeptember 29, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 716 S.W.2d 1 (Dizer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dizer v. State, 716 S.W.2d 1, 290 Ark. 68, 1986 Ark. LEXIS 2200 (Ark. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record in case CR 85-185 from the Crittenden Circuit Court was tendered late, because the appellant’s attorney miscalculated the time for filing the record. The attorney for appellant, Gerald A. Coleman, admits responsibility for the miscalculation. That admission on the part of counsel constitutes good cause for granting the motion. Per Curiam Order of Feb. 5,1979,265 Ark. 964. The motion for a rule on the clerk is accordingly granted.

A copy of this order will be sent to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The record in case CR 85-185 from the Crittenden Circuit Court was tendered late, because the appellant’s attorney miscalculated the time for filing the record. The attorney for appellant, Gerald A. Coleman, admits responsibility for the miscalculation. That admission on the part of counsel constitutes good cause for granting the motion. Per Curiam Order of Feb. 5,1979,265 Ark. 964. The motion for a rule on the clerk is accordingly granted.

A copy of this order will be sent to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

716 S.W.2d 1, 290 Ark. 68, 1986 Ark. LEXIS 2200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dizer-v-state-ark-1986.