Dizen v. Bates

New York Supreme Court

Dizen v. Bates

7 Johns. 537

DecidedFebruary 15, 1811

StatusPublished

This text of 7 Johns. 537 (Dizen v. Bates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dizen v. Bates, 7 Johns. 537 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1811).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion must be denied. The proceedings on the part of the defendant have been regular. The rule is explicit, that the defendant, having duly appeared, may, at any time thereafter, take a rule against the plaintiff to declare before the end of the term next following, after service of the notice of the rule. Where the service of the notice is at any time before the term, the plaintiff is in default, if he does not declare before the end of the term.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The motion must be denied. The proceedings on the part of the defendant have been regular. The rule is explicit, that the defendant, having duly appeared, may, at any time thereafter, take a rule against the plaintiff to declare before the end of the term next following, after service of the notice of the rule. Where the service of the notice is at any time before the term, the plaintiff is in default, if he does not declare before the end of the term.

Motion denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Johns. 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dizen-v-bates-nysupct-1811.