Dizek v. Racette
This text of 96 A.D.2d 1009 (Dizek v. Racette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Motion to restore an appeal previously withdrawn and discontinued by consent, or, in the alternative, to “so order” a stipulation of settlement, denied, without costs. Application for relief pursuant to CPLR article 78 denied upon the ground such application must be instituted before a Special Term of Supreme Court (CPLR 7804, subd [b]). Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Yesawich, Jr., Weiss and Levine, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 A.D.2d 1009, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dizek-v-racette-nyappdiv-1983.