Dixson v. State
785 So. 2d 744, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7485, 2001 WL 579832
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 30, 2001·No. No. 3D00-2663·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. See Rhodes v. State, 701 So.2d 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)(Neither defense attorney nor trial court is required to warn defendant of sentence-enhancing consequences that defendant’s plea will have as to any future crimes defendant may commit; neither trial court nor defense counsel has duty to anticipate defendant’s recidivism.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dixson v. State, 785 So. 2d 744, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7485, 2001 WL 579832 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
785 So. 2d 744 (Dixson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Major v. State
790 So. 2d 550 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
State v. Diaz
785 So. 2d 744 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)