Dixson v. State
785 So. 2d 744, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7485, 2001 WL 579832
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 30, 2001
DocketNo. 3D00-2663
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 785 So. 2d 744 (Dixson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dixson v. State, 785 So. 2d 744, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7485, 2001 WL 579832 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Rhodes v. State, 701 So.2d 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)(Neither defense attorney nor trial court is required to warn defendant of sentence-enhancing consequences that defendant’s plea will have as to any future crimes defendant may commit; neither trial court nor defense counsel has duty to anticipate defendant’s recidivism.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Major v. State
790 So. 2d 550 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
State v. Diaz
785 So. 2d 744 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
785 So. 2d 744, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 7485, 2001 WL 579832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixson-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.