Dixon's Lessee v. Cavenaugh

1 Tenn. 365
CourtTennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity
DecidedNovember 6, 1808
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Tenn. 365 (Dixon's Lessee v. Cavenaugh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Superior Court for Law and Equity primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dixon's Lessee v. Cavenaugh, 1 Tenn. 365 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1808).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The act of 1801, c. 11. directs, that bail shall be taken of defendants in ejectment, so that costs may be rendered safe. If bail should not be given, the defendant must be committed of course. This act has induced the same necessity for precision in the name of a defendant in ejectment, as in any other action. Therefore the plea will be. But what will be its effect ? Not an abatment of the action. That remains as before the passage of the act ; the same form in every respect.

The plea in abatement discharges the defendants bail, but notice having been served on him, and having disclosed in his plea his true name, he must plead in chief by that name, or the court will permit judgment by default to be taken against him, and he will be turned out of possession.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Tenn. 365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixons-lessee-v-cavenaugh-tennsuperct-1808.