Dixon v. Williams

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Tyrone Dixon,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:19cv176

John M. Williams, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on August 20, 2019 (Doc. 32). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 32) have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 32) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge: the Joint Motion of Defendants Driehaus, Monzel, and Portune to Dismiss (Doc. 14) is GRANTED; Plaintiff’s Rule 55 Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 17) is DENIED; Defendant Williams’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 25) is GRANTED; Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the Complaint (Doc. 29) is DENIED; Defendant Peterson’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 21) is DENIED as MOOT; and all

1 remaining claims against all remaining defendants are DISMISSED sua sponte under §§ 1915(e) and 1915A. IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court