Dixon v. US Satellite Headquarters

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedJuly 23, 2009
DocketCivil Action No. 2009-1365
StatusPublished

This text of Dixon v. US Satellite Headquarters (Dixon v. US Satellite Headquarters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dixon v. US Satellite Headquarters, (D.D.C. 2009).

Opinion

FILED JUL 2.3 2009 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Clerk, U.S. District and FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Bankruptcy Courts

Ernest L. Dixon, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 02 1365 ) United States Satellite Headquarters, ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On May 7, 2009, the plaintiff submitted this brief pro se complaint along with 98 others,

each accompanied by a separate application to proceed in forma pauperis.l The 98 complaints,

which are attached to this memorandum opinion as an appendix, will be consolidated with the

complaint in this case for purposes of disposition and dismissed as frivolous.

Like numerous complaints previously filed by this plaintiff, see, e.g., Mem. Op. Dixon v.

60-George Ct., Hampton, Virginia, Civil Action 08-2151 (UNA) (D.D.C. Dec. 11,2008)

(generally describing 22 complaints consolidated therein); Order, Dixon v. Cattle Ranch, Civil

Action 09-969 (UNA) (D.D.C. May 26,2009) (generally describing 19 complaints consolidated

therein), 95 of the 99 complaints, purport to sue various public and private properties or entities,

such as the "United States Satellite Headquarters in Tokyo, Japan," "Rolls Royce" in France, the

United States District Court. for the District of Columbia, Sibley Hospital, Lenoir County (N.C.)

Library, and "Amtrak Trains," either "for all my earnings" or for no stated reason. Just four of

the 99 complaints deviate from this general theme. Those four seek $999 quadrillion dollars in

compensatory damages and an equal amount in punitive damages from each of the following

1 In addition, the plaintiff submitted another three pro se complaints that same day, which

will be disposed of independently.

,\ defendants: (1) the University of North Carolina for allegedly building on plaintiffs land;

(2) James N. Peters for "having his name on my building without my permission;" (3) the

Kinston, North Carolina "Records of Deed Office" because they "said I needed the date and the

year before I could purchase my deeds;" and (4) the Kinston Housing Authority for "taking

control and renting and collecting from my Queen Court Apartments." It is evident from the

both the nature of the allegations and the number of complaints filed by this pro se plaintiff, who

lists his address as "Sixteen Hundred Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington, D.C.," that they are

based on fantastic or delusional scenarios, which subjects them to immediate dismissal. See

Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319,328 (1989).

A separate order of dismissal accompanies this memorandum opinion.

- 2- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Ernest L. Dixon, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) United States Satellite Headquarters, ) ) Defendant. )

APPENDIX TO MEMORANDUM OPINION , j , j , j , j , j , j , j , j , j , j , j , j , j , j , j , j , j , j , j ,j ,j 'j I j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j MAY - 7 2009 j Clerk, U.S. D\strlct and j Bankruptcy Courts j j j j j j MAY - 7 2009 Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts MAY - 7 2D03 Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts 1

tof 1fLf 0YJ!KI' c f 0 CVd IV( 1f]P /fl \ , ,'-tiJ ii! ) I .. to \ 1 1 1

WI/.5A;I1~j/J,JJ J)~rr ~3 17 \ ~f}) IfJ& 10M VC¥I 3 J (o~ /, fift;tV JS \

~u ;N,~ S;» lrct?5 ~ Of,':1 5 !j;;f1 t (t 11, fbt Tli/ 112/ W{JJJ~f)5'1 J I,

,r rJ ( fi~1 P\ d1r:f)/t)lf )' / /l/lJ:. 1 (jI {/./ \ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1

U;vihJ s)Ak5 y/sbJ CO(Jv( 1 1 1

fot fits f;5k;cf jf Co/umpifl 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,. Jm/jil/ ;;:LJ&JJl py;o;:l 1 1 1 1 1 1

wnsMfjJ!v;t C,»&01 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 JJU utJ (§; /5}lfJ;Jii1 /1tJ'L f;&01 ' 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

#fPf~1f~k~ 751t/r!/ of ~~ 1 1 1

,(}u fJ/tHrfth 1

')hvriNjif; V. r;~y5 1 1

I() )fJ 1 1 1

-:f u5.1 111 Jt 71/1/( 1

,~,) ~ 1

5!?'O, / jY ! v __ 1

1 1

"x//..,/.~ .1 _ 'f)". ~ fi ~t( 1 1 1 1

~tUffi / • {!, 1 1 1 1 1 c\erk, u.s. District and BanKruptCY courts j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j ~ j

j j j j RECEIVED j MAY - 7 2009 j Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts j j j j 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~-''CS''1'. 1 ~~r~~ 1 1 1 1 c\er\<.. U.S. District tS and Ban'KnlptC'Y Cot!i 1 1 1 1 1 I (jf(jJ led etfllcs))/ ~5fr/ of ( ~vIf; 4/7li[ jJ;:s/;tICJ oj dJ/oPlf)//l :iM/ifd 77711[/7! j;PVESI)/ PA /if (j/!J5;};~/f) /; (lp ~J6rJ 1/. WJ 1(3 .~ lJ) 2}6&5 ;;;;tfrd~(df/Jm///j!l?/1/[51/ L ?!p'tV /s SCfAvt1 cYo g/1JE O/!/~ I //b,.Y't a/pOI(/, 0Jo/il,~ dIe)if, '(W/ ch ;jl((/, (/(fl , / - Ild ( ifF S ()

~/ /7c{J£ ., ~ijfd? *;r// j1JeI [)/( ~ ,I £)L~dJ~. 7 (r---"'-e;:r ~~ 4~JJ"6{;> 7 MAY - 7 2009 Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts UIv,!f£) 5l:lf/tj~»S-j:/c: j} v ' I j

f~m1f/c/mYII///ft/[jcsj~:;15f},11 i j

5: /'(5? t1~ }?C;;U5zs1 i «. i /)Y tJIJ5/;/;Z) J;J IV [AJ{/ f) i /fJ/lJ5f()~ ((}o. '!! V!£tJ//AJij :(gju/ i :;;{&i;zd$J7///c/!/ ~ .~.LrYMI /s i SC)(~fj£ KyrJ5f'S/OM /77? ;?tWz£ /7/ .. i

:314JJ:U/j-:Z;: v;~;df ;:w/ ~~~~ I Y£#J~#vtlc

. ( '~0ihi j j . j /j ~j

j j j {iz);/fc,/ S#?~ 5 l?))Il,cf(60/(1 P /fliJhtf/JKJ ~f- {Jj @ JJ/~/?j? gsJj£dI//m)/Jf/lfjr;f~) 8fcVzJ 5f11££/1/&AJd~;;,;) f£I()SJ};IlJli/7)fiI&t/JAE d)1J5/;J~~!Jd '73167 . 1/ r{t)[fI!)W5i& · J/vfJ1j#£td W/J))J!l/fJ£9; ;rf/i/;a~ !ldf7!I:rIlI/fAJ[JrJ/~~ /J 5U;~ iW/AJ It;;J;l1} Af~· w; alP)vU/i.. iG /1(/~/ fllfAJifJ'*,y ILJIjN~#'£;ffp :;JrH- J/J; i/

t'i!lf~' #7'1Ji/?1Jt)4f1/ Clerk~~Ys~~s~~~:tand Bankruptcy Courts UIIJJ'rvd SJ;;lt~ pj'j~;{!1 (b[/~;' ;;;1 ~ r:c;/rc,~' c(lCUJJt6j j(c)iaJ !/dJlJift/J1. p/Jgsc!) f?~zJ u&zz6 Idrdc¢zcl 2W~&4~/#&Jd~L aj;ls/;/~9;P? »161 jj!£JdtJi#tv ;f)~ fhg 4PA O;/J: /:0/~

. {j!C-:;!'~c25Zf;'N5 cJt~;iW~fJh/fg~ o,J 1:4/1f:gdrhfJtft ()~?I/J ;;;&~MIi (J;g););}4~ ~ 6J;~)V#t IYj5" r/J v£~ $4;J)pJ~70V&;Lo wt/IiJ~/d/t;Yf5 b1&J/7~ 1Jf~~ , 6:;' u ( (. /17 u EC c: 0~.,.1l ~~~; A.'.~~~

MAY - 7 2009 Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts .- ) c\erk, IJ. S. District and Ban\(.ruptcv courts j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j j Clerk, U.S. District and j Bankruptcy Courts j j j j j j UvAJ ~/!As R5icli2!fff I'

/cit ~ jJ;;/wef c!0!tt7/f};bl i

Ahi£d ;Jdmlml ./A/2)1/, Pfi!y i j

iJllJ, lf3rJ~ 11 (,?), (J( i V j

/JiJ-/I//!rJ;6 51&£1 i /(/!()(3cft;4 A/(J£ii Vl/!tJk4#A9,5/1 i :;;;/&rh£zd jlJJjJ;Jt4/MJ:z5~~ ;0pd)~ SU;;;; I

I d6~ 71/11(f() j) S!:cai //) IiiIJJJp ~ /Uj#i (I#,.IJ), a- i fj~;J/l1j1/ E!l(Uf;I{j~ *~L)iu/ i

. ~~~w6c7;;;~ i (lfo!~~ p' ~I tV( -:; Jf2 ';z. (i,o 1 i ~'1! r:C~t\/~n' t'~"«\~~ ~g..JI~ ftiI ~u I J

MAY - 7 2009 j

Clerk, U.S. District and j Bankruptcy Courts j

j j j j j j j _ 1

t/N;JuJ 'Jj~}r's1t/~1 c~uJ \, fit# f'l5~~1 of edurrtP1f} \ 1

Sly:!f}:P f/LtN~ / rtJJSj r;;J/!l& \, Wf!J hi y)/()41c/pbb7 ~ . ~pV \ II

C6 . ~ pllv I,

. . N. II{!; r: . /IO~ J~ II

, Ul o J\ tv 0 1 I "1 /

lei f//wmiJ £/lpfl- ·. 3-~ WI} t3 \ ~: Y II

;~,!p. V/ \ L •.

I J r;h rJj vSll

"'"-;1~~£;~;~ r ,.,/'~ f) c:pM .It ? r\ \, I j

~. /) . I / e ) [6: C{}/)1 L J'/. ./ /('1// i I ) l j j j

cd;Jc51;/3/tJ~ 7Jf!J;;z!fJf1)//)#;kd/j{/ /

;: i

IIm/{, ?:;i;v / 7/!-/1r WJ'/;)£;(?d;/J /hScqS i 1l~W6A&;%(¥l/p;;/u/ ZS2f/ ..7 i ~ j

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neitzke v. Williams
490 U.S. 319 (Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dixon v. US Satellite Headquarters, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-us-satellite-headquarters-dcd-2009.