Dixon v. Taqueria LA 20 LLC
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
MADELEINE DIXON CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS NO. 24-950
TAQUERIA LA 20, LLC, ET AL. SECTION “R” (3)
ORDER
Plaintiff Madeleine Dixon filed an unopposed motion for reimbursement of service expenses.1 On November 27, 2024, Magistrate Judge Eva J. Dossier issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that the Court grant plaintiff’s motion and order Defendants Taqueria LA 20, LLC and Sean Toups to jointly pay plaintiff the total sum of $1,025.00.2 Defendants did not object to the R&R. Therefore, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc), superseded by statute on other grounds, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s note (1983) (“When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.”). The Court finds no clear error.
1 R. Doc. 17. 2 R. Doc. 23 at 6. Accordingly, the Court adopts Magistrate Judge Dossier’s R&R as its opinion. The Court GRANTS plaintiffs motion for reimbursement of service
expenses. The Court ORDERS defendants Taqueria LA 20, LLC and Sean Toups to jointly pay plaintiff the total sum of $1,025.00.
New Orleans, Louisiana, this 30th day of December, 2024. Lorn Vaver. SARAH S. VANCE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dixon v. Taqueria LA 20 LLC (Dixon v. Taqueria LA 20 LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.