Dixon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Dixon v. State

383 S.W.2d 928, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1127

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedNovember 18, 1964

Docket37099

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 383 S.W.2d 928 (Dixon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dixon v. State, 383 S.W.2d 928, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1127 (Tex. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The conviction is for robbery; the punishment, thirty-five years.

The evidence includes a written statement signed by the appellant, which the state introduced in evidence before the jury. The statement is incriminating and connects the appellant with the commission of the offense of robbery charged against him and for which he was herein convicted.

An issue as to the voluntary nature of the written statement was raised by the evidence. Such issue was submitted by the court in its charge to the jury without the trial court having resolved the issue of whether the written statement was voluntarily made. Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908, requires that the judgment be reversed and remanded for a trial at which the issue as to the voluntariness of the confession may be resolved. See Lopez v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 384 S.W.2d 345, and Harris v. State, Tex. Cr.App., 384 S.W.2d 349, decided November 11, 1964.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BELCHER, Commissioner.

The conviction is for robbery; the punishment, thirty-five years.

The evidence includes a written statement signed by the appellant, which the state introduced in evidence before the jury. The statement is incriminating and connects the appellant with the commission of the offense of robbery charged against him and for which he was herein convicted.

An issue as to the voluntary nature of the written statement was raised by the evidence. Such issue was submitted by the court in its charge to the jury without the trial court having resolved the issue of whether the written statement was voluntarily made. Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368, 84 S.Ct. 1774, 12 L.Ed.2d 908, requires that the judgment be reversed and remanded for a trial at which the issue as to the voluntariness of the confession may be resolved. See Lopez v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 384 S.W.2d 345, and Harris v. State, Tex. Cr.App., 384 S.W.2d 349, decided November 11, 1964.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

383 S.W.2d 928, 1964 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-state-texcrimapp-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack