Dixon v. State

115 S.W.2d 414, 134 Tex. Crim. 221, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 296
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 30, 1938
DocketNo. 19600.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 115 S.W.2d 414 (Dixon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dixon v. State, 115 S.W.2d 414, 134 Tex. Crim. 221, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 296 (Tex. 1938).

Opinion

Christian, Judge.

The offense is possession of intoxicating liquor in a dry area for the purpose of sale; the punishment, a fine of $100.00.

There is no evidence in the record in support of the averments in the complaint and information that a local option election had been held in Scurry County; that said election had resulted in the prohibition of the sale of intoxicating liquor; and that the result had been declared and the declaration published. Appellant’s contention that, in the absence of such proof, the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction, must be sustained. Humphreys v. State, 99 S. W. (2d) 600; Green v. State, 101 S. W. (2d) 241.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campbell v. State
176 S.W.2d 174 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
115 S.W.2d 414, 134 Tex. Crim. 221, 1938 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-state-texcrimapp-1938.