Dixon v. State

79 S.W.2d 869, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 760

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dixon v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 128 Tex. Crim. 584 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 27, 1935·No. No. 17416·Published

Opinion

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of robbery, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. No defect either in the indictment or in the procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has 'been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of robbery, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of five years.

The judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has 'been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

Dixon v. State, 79 S.W.2d 869, 1935 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 760 (Tex. 1935).

Pincite

79 S.W.2d 869 (Dixon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.