Dixon v. State

16 S.W.2d 1116, 112 Tex. Crim. 348, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 363
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dixon v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 108 Tex. Crim. 650
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided March 27, 1929·No. No. 12235.·Published

Opinions

MARTIN, Judge.

— Offense, robbery by assault; penalty, five years in the penitentiary.

Prosecuting witness, R. M. Howell, was the night watchman at a laundry. The place was robbed of about $1300.00 at the point of a pistol and appellant was shown by appropriate testimony to have been the offender.

No bills of exception appear in the record.

We have carefully examined the statement of facts, and believing the evidence sufficient, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dixon v. State, 16 S.W.2d 1116, 112 Tex. Crim. 348, 1929 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 363 (Tex. 1929).

16 S.W.2d 1116 (Dixon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.