Dixon v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Dixon v. State

228 N.W. 938, 119 Neb. 299, 1930 Neb. LEXIS 23

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided January 24, 1930·No. No. 27252·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the oral arguments, the briefs and the entire record, no error prejudicial to the rights of plaintiff in error has been found. The judgment of conviction is therefore affirmed.

It is believed that the sentence is more severe than the record warrants, and it is therefore modified so as to vacate that part of the judgment requiring the plaintiff in error to be imprisoned, and in lieu thereof a fine of $200 is imposed; plaintiff in error to stand committed to jail until such fine and costs are paid.

As modified herein, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Upon consideration of the oral arguments, the briefs and the entire record, no error prejudicial to the rights of plaintiff in error has been found. The judgment of conviction is therefore affirmed.

It is believed that the sentence is more severe than the record warrants, and it is therefore modified so as to vacate that part of the judgment requiring the plaintiff in error to be imprisoned, and in lieu thereof a fine of $200 is imposed; plaintiff in error to stand committed to jail until such fine and costs are paid.

As modified herein, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Affirmed as modified.

Dixon v. State, 228 N.W. 938, 119 Neb. 299, 1930 Neb. LEXIS 23 (Neb. 1930).

Pincite

228 N.W. 938 (Dixon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.