Dixon v. State

404 S.W.3d 327, 2012 WL 5493372, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1421
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 13, 2012·No. No. ED 98207·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Kevin Dixon, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dixon v. State, 404 S.W.3d 327, 2012 WL 5493372, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1421 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

404 S.W.3d 327 (Dixon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.