Dixon v. State

283 S.E.2d 901, 159 Ga. App. 470, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2651
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dixon v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 154 Ga. App. 828
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 9, 1981·No. 62320·Published

Opinion

Deen, Presiding Judge.

The defendant appeals from a revocation of the probationary features of his sentence on a former conviction for violation of the Controlled Substances Act. Appointed counsel moved to withdraw and, in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967), filed a brief raising points of law which might arguably support the appeal. This court has granted the motion to withdraw and in addition fully combed the record in accordance with Bethay v. State, 237 Ga. 625 (229 SE2d 406) (1976) and determined that no reversible error appears. Boyd v. State, 244 Ga. 130 (5) (259 SE2d 71) (1979).

Judgment affirmed.

Banke and Carley, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dixon v. State, 283 S.E.2d 901, 159 Ga. App. 470, 1981 Ga. App. LEXIS 2651 (Ga. Ct. App. 1981).

283 S.E.2d 901 (Dixon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Boyd v. State
259 S.E.2d 71 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)
Bethay v. State
229 S.E.2d 406 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)