Dixon v. State
182 S.E. 687, 52 Ga. App. 200, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 100
This text of 182 S.E. 687 (Dixon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Dixon v. State, 182 S.E. 687, 52 Ga. App. 200, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 100 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).
Opinion
The defendant was eonvieted of possessing whisky. The evidence amply authorized the verdict. The special grounds of the motion for new trial, not having been argued or referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ronemous v. State
74 S.E.2d 676 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
182 S.E. 687, 52 Ga. App. 200, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-state-gactapp-1935.