Dixon v. State
182 S.E. 687, 52 Ga. App. 200, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 100
Opinion
The defendant was eonvieted of possessing whisky. The evidence amply authorized the verdict. The special grounds of the motion for new trial, not having been argued or referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dixon v. State, 182 S.E. 687, 52 Ga. App. 200, 1935 Ga. App. LEXIS 100 (Ga. Ct. App. 1935).
182 S.E. 687 (Dixon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ronemous v. State
74 S.E.2d 676 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)