Dixon v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Dixon v. State

140 S.E. 795, 37 Ga. App. 486, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 357

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedDecember 13, 1927

Docket18488

StatusPublished

This text of 140 S.E. 795 (Dixon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dixon v. State, 140 S.E. 795, 37 Ga. App. 486, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 357 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

While there are some special grounds of the motion for a new trial, with subdivisions, the only thing argued by counsel for the plaintiff in error is that the verdict is not supported by the evidence. There is no general insistence on all the grounds of the motion. The jury has settled the issues of fact in favor of the State; their finding has been approved by the judge who tried the case, and this court will not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

While there are some special grounds of the motion for a new trial, with subdivisions, the only thing argued by counsel for the plaintiff in error is that the verdict is not supported by the evidence. There is no general insistence on all the grounds of the motion. The jury has settled the issues of fact in favor of the State; their finding has been approved by the judge who tried the case, and this court will not interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 S.E. 795, 37 Ga. App. 486, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-state-gactapp-1927.