Dixon v. State
67 S.E. 699, 7 Ga. App. 604, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 419
Opinion
The circumstances corroborating the positive testimony- of the accomplice are of some probative value, and their sufficiency for the purpose of corroboration was entirely a matter for the determination of the jury. This court will not disturb the judgment of the trial judge overruling the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dixon v. State, 67 S.E. 699, 7 Ga. App. 604, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 419 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).
67 S.E. 699 (Dixon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baldwin v. State
84 S.E. 727 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)