Dixon v. State

820 So. 2d 342, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3953, 2002 WL 460313
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 27, 2002·No. No. 4D00-4218·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant the motion for rehearing and affirm on the authority of Spann v. State, 772 So.2d 38 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), and Mills v. State, 773 So.2d 650 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), rev. granted, 790 So.2d 1105 (Fla.2001).

WARNER, FARMER and GROSS, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dixon v. State, 820 So. 2d 342, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 3953, 2002 WL 460313 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

820 So. 2d 342 (Dixon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Suarez v. Gonzalez
820 So. 2d 342 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)