Dixon v. State

805 So. 2d 1033, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18512, 2001 WL 1744706
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dixon v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1299
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 28, 2001·No. No. 2D01-4980·Published

Opinion

WHATLEY, Acting Chief Judge.

Keith Rashad Dixon appeals the dismissal of his motion for reduction or modification of sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). [1034]*1034We convert this appeal to a petition for writ of certiorari and grant the petition.

Dixon initially filed a direct appeal from a final judgment and sentence. The case was affirmed on June 1, 2001. Dixon v. State, 790 So.2d 414, (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (table). The mandate was issued on June 26, 2001. Dixon then filed a timely rule 3.800(c) motion on July 26, 2001. The trial court dismissed the 3.800(c) motion because the court mistakenly believed that the mandate had not yet been issued. Since the mandate had been issued, the trial court had jurisdiction to hear the motion, and thus, the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law by dismissing the motion. See Johnson v. State, 776 So.2d 1026, 1026 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).

We grant the petition for writ of certio-rari and direct the trial court to rule on the merits of Dixon’s motion for reduction or modification of sentence filed pursuant to rule 3.800(c).

Petition granted.

COVINGTON, J., and THREADGILL, EDWARD F., Senior Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dixon v. State, 805 So. 2d 1033, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18512, 2001 WL 1744706 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

805 So. 2d 1033 (Dixon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
776 So. 2d 1026 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)