Dixon v. State
722 So. 2d 937, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16010, 1998 WL 889743
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dixon v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 691 So. 2d 515 →
Opinions
Anwar Dixon appeals his guideline sentence. He argues that the trial court im[938]*938posed the sentence, in part, because he exercised his right to a speedy trial. His claim is not supported by the record.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dixon v. State, 722 So. 2d 937, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 16010, 1998 WL 889743 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
722 So. 2d 937 (Dixon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Offutt v. United States
348 U.S. 11 (Supreme Court, 1954)
Johnson v. State
679 So. 2d 831 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Gallucci v. State
371 So. 2d 148 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)