Dixon v. State
432 So. 2d 779, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20514
Opinion
Dixon appeals the denial of his Rule 3.850 motion for postconviction relief. We affirm.
Dixon argues that since only his co-felon carried a rifle, he should not have been convicted of armed robbery. Vicarious possession is sufficient to sustain the conviction, Hillman v. State, 410 So.2d 180 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). He further argues that he should not have received a three-year mandatory minimum. The record is clear that he did not.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dixon v. State, 432 So. 2d 779, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20514 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).
432 So. 2d 779 (Dixon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Williams v. State
479 So. 2d 227 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)