Dixon v. State
Opinion
Pies Dixon was tried and convicted of the crime of murder in the first degree without recommendation to mercy. He has appealed from the judgment.
*20 The evidence shows that the defendant waited in ambush for the deceased and then, without warning, shot deceased at point-blank range with a shot gun. Although the defendant interposed the plea of self-defense the jury did not believe his version of the controversy, but chose to believe, the testimony offered by the prosecution. The defendant was given a fair trial by an impartial judge and jury and the evidence amply sustains the verdict and judgment. The judgment appealed from is therefore affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
22 So. 2d 253 (Dixon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.