Dixon v. State

22 Ark. 213
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 15, 1860
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 22 Ark. 213 (Dixon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dixon v. State, 22 Ark. 213 (Ark. 1860).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Compton

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellant, Dixon, was convicted and fined in the court below, for gaming; and he brings the case before this court on exception taken to the decision of the Circuit Court overruling his motion for a new trial.

The only error assigned is, that the verdict of the jury is without evidence to support it. But one witness was examined, and he testified, that within twelve months, to the best of his recollection, before the finding of the indictment, he saw Dixon exhibiting Chuck-a-luck in the back room of a grocery in Jackson county; that Dixon was dealing, and a number of persons betting; and that Chuck-a-luck was a game adapted, designed and devised to play a game of chance, at which money might be won and lost. It would be difficult to imagine how the jury could have found other than a verdict of guilty on this evidence. There is surety no total want of evidence to support the verdict, and unless there was, we could not disturb the finding.

Let the judgment be in all things affirmed wish costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rhea v. State
147 S.W. 463 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1912)
Poe v. State
129 S.W. 292 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1910)
Wiley v. State
124 S.W. 249 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1909)
Ferguson v. State
122 S.W. 236 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 Ark. 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-state-ark-1860.