Dixon v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Dixon v. State

108 So. 922, 21 Ala. App. 667

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 20, 1926

Docket1 Div. 649.

StatusPublished

This text of 108 So. 922 (Dixon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dixon v. State, 108 So. 922, 21 Ala. App. 667 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The indictment in this ca!se is in proper form and substance. It contains two counts. The first count charges this appellant with unlawfully distilling, making, or manufacturing alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of wMeh was alcohol. The second count charges the unlawful possession of a still, etc. There was a general verdict of guilty as charged in the indictment. Judgment was pronounced and entered accordingly; the defendant being sentenced to serve an indeterminate term of im *668 prisonment in the penitentiary. Erom said judgment he appealed. There is no bill of exceptions, and it is certified to this court that the time for filing same has expired. The appeal is upon the record proper. No error is apparent on the record. The judgment of conviction is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The indictment in this ca!se is in proper form and substance. It contains two counts. The first count charges this appellant with unlawfully distilling, making, or manufacturing alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of wMeh was alcohol. The second count charges the unlawful possession of a still, etc. There was a general verdict of guilty as charged in the indictment. Judgment was pronounced and entered accordingly; the defendant being sentenced to serve an indeterminate term of im *668 prisonment in the penitentiary. Erom said judgment he appealed. There is no bill of exceptions, and it is certified to this court that the time for filing same has expired. The appeal is upon the record proper. No error is apparent on the record. The judgment of conviction is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 So. 922, 21 Ala. App. 667, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-state-alactapp-1926.