Dixon v. State

167 So. 349, 232 Ala. 150, 1936 Ala. LEXIS 178
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedApril 9, 1936
Docket6 Div. 924.
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases

This text of 167 So. 349 (Dixon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dixon v. State, 167 So. 349, 232 Ala. 150, 1936 Ala. LEXIS 178 (Ala. 1936).

Opinion

BOULDIN, Justice.

This court has fully considered the several grounds upon which the constitutionality of the act in question is assailed. They are fully treated and correctly decided in the opinion of the Court of Appeals. We see no occasion for further discussion of these questions on our part.

Touching the insistence here made that this act does not in terms repeal certain sections of the general law, it is sufficient to say: Being an original and not an amendatory act, it repeals, in the counties designated, such provisions of existing law as 'are in direct conflict therewith. *151 This, under the well-known rule that the last expression of the legislative will is the law.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER .and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. Vinson
749 So. 2d 393 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1999)
Knotts v. State
686 So. 2d 431 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1995)
Henderson by Hartsfield v. Alabama Power
627 So. 2d 878 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1993)
Clark v. Container Corp. of America, Inc.
589 So. 2d 184 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1991)
Moore v. Mobile Infirmary Ass'n
592 So. 2d 156 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1991)
Ex Parte Randle
554 So. 2d 1131 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1987)
Ex Parte DeMent
424 So. 2d 659 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1982)
Opinion of the Justices
425 So. 2d 407 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1982)
Tucker v. State
383 So. 2d 579 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1980)
Whisenhant v. State
370 So. 2d 1080 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1979)
Bracewell v. State
407 So. 2d 827 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1979)
White v. State
347 So. 2d 566 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1977)
Mayes v. State
350 So. 2d 339 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1977)
Liptroth v. State
335 So. 2d 683 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1976)
Belcher v. McKinney
333 So. 2d 136 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1976)
Colston v. State
325 So. 2d 520 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1975)
Mallory v. State
313 So. 2d 203 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1975)
Ex Parte Burns
22 So. 2d 517 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1945)
Kirk v. State
22 So. 2d 431 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 So. 349, 232 Ala. 150, 1936 Ala. LEXIS 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-state-ala-1936.