Dixon v. Silberblatt

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Dixon v. Silberblatt

86 N.Y.S. 262

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 86 N.Y.S. 262 (Dixon v. Silberblatt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dixon v. Silberblatt, 86 N.Y.S. 262 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

MacLEAN, J.

In this action for the rental of certain premises foi the month of March, 1903, the agent of the plaintiff testified that the defendant’s tenancy was for the year May 1, 1902, to May 1, 1903, and that he was in occupation during part of March; the defendant and his wife testified that the hiring was from month to month, and that they moved out in February; thus presenting a question of fact which the learned justice has resolved in favor of the plaintiffs, and in whose favor the evidence predominated.

Judgment affirmed,, with costs to the respondents. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacLEAN, J.

In this action for the rental of certain premises foi the month of March, 1903, the agent of the plaintiff testified that the defendant’s tenancy was for the year May 1, 1902, to May 1, 1903, and that he was in occupation during part of March; the defendant and his wife testified that the hiring was from month to month, and that they moved out in February; thus presenting a question of fact which the learned justice has resolved in favor of the plaintiffs, and in whose favor the evidence predominated.

Judgment affirmed,, with costs to the respondents. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

86 N.Y.S. 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-silberblatt-nyappterm-1904.