Dixon v. Shearer

98 Misc. 614
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided February 15, 1917·Published

Opinion

Bijur, J.

It appears that defendant, a non-resident of this state, was in attendance at the trial of an action in which he was a defendant. During an adjournment of the trial over the recess for lunch, between one and two p. m., the action-was settled, and immediately thereupon defendant was served with a summons in the instant case, the service actually taking place in the court room.

Non-resident parties to an action pending in the courts of this state enjoy the privilege of exemption from service of process while attending court and during a reasonable time before and after the trial. This privilege “ is deemed necessary for the maintenance of its (the court’s) authority and dignity and in order to promote the due and efficient administration of justice.” Bunce v. Humphrey, 214 N. Y. 21; Netograph Mfg. Co. v. Scrugham, 197 id. 377, 380; Roberts v. Thomson, 149 App. Div. 437; Stewart v. Ramsay, 242 U. S. 128.

Judgment and order reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed with costs.

Guy and Mullan, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order reversed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dixon v. Shearer, 98 Misc. 614 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

98 Misc. 614 (Dixon v. Shearer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stewart v. Ramsay
242 U.S. 128 (Supreme Court, 1916)
Bunce v. . Humphrey
108 N.E. 95 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
Roberts v. Thompson
149 A.D. 437 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)