Dixon v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.

65 S.E. 351, 83 S.C. 392, 1909 S.C. LEXIS 164
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedAugust 19, 1909
Docket7282
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 65 S.E. 351 (Dixon v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dixon v. Seaboard Air Line Ry., 65 S.E. 351, 83 S.C. 392, 1909 S.C. LEXIS 164 (S.C. 1909).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

This is an action for breach of contract.

The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for four hundred dollars.

The defendant made a motion for a new trial, which was granted, whereupon the plaintiff appealed.

The order is not appealable. Lampley v. Ry., 77 S. C., 319, 57 S. E., 1104; Pace v. Ry., infra 33, 64 S. E. R., 915.

The appeal is dismissed, but without prejudice to the rights of the parties to the action.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Quinn
133 S.E. 444 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1926)
Snipes v. Davis, Director General
127 S.E. 447 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1925)
Daughty v. Northwestern Railroad
75 S.E. 553 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1912)
McKnight v. Dyson
74 S.E. 753 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1912)
Simmons v. Mason
70 S.E. 898 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1911)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 S.E. 351, 83 S.C. 392, 1909 S.C. LEXIS 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dixon-v-seaboard-air-line-ry-sc-1909.