Dixon v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.
65 S.E. 351, 83 S.C. 392, 1909 S.C. LEXIS 164
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This is an action for breach of contract.
The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for four hundred dollars.
The defendant made a motion for a new trial, which was granted, whereupon the plaintiff appealed.
The order is not appealable. Lampley v. Ry., 77 S. C., 319, 57 S. E., 1104; Pace v. Ry., infra 33, 64 S. E. R., 915.
The appeal is dismissed, but without prejudice to the rights of the parties to the action.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dixon v. Seaboard Air Line Ry., 65 S.E. 351, 83 S.C. 392, 1909 S.C. LEXIS 164 (S.C. 1909).
65 S.E. 351 (Dixon v. Seaboard Air Line Ry.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Walker v. Quinn
133 S.E. 444 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1926)
Snipes v. Davis, Director General
127 S.E. 447 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1925)
Daughty v. Northwestern Railroad
75 S.E. 553 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1912)
McKnight v. Dyson
74 S.E. 753 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1912)
Simmons v. Mason
70 S.E. 898 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1911)