Dixon v. Roessler
57 S.E. 203, 76 S.C. 415, 1907 S.C. LEXIS 75
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This Court is satisfied with the conclusion of the Circuit Judge and the reasoning on which it rests. We express no opinion, however, as to the character of the interest or estate which the daughter Margaret took in the lot on St. Phillip' street, as that point is not involved in the appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dixon v. Roessler, 57 S.E. 203, 76 S.C. 415, 1907 S.C. LEXIS 75 (S.C. 1907).
57 S.E. 203 (Dixon v. Roessler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mack v. Stanley
2 S.E.2d 792 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1939)
Shired v. Nesbit
72 S.E. 545 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1911)
E. A. Beall Co. v. Weston
65 S.E. 823 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1909)